Teasley and Wider’s text continues to
impress me as I read through this chapter. The viewer-response approach they
proposed stresses the active role of viewers as well as the importance of
discussion and collaboration in literary/film study. They believe that as
students become active viewers, they would be more awareness of different
perspectives and techniques that a movie contains, which prepares students to
become long-term viewers and learners. As for the role of teacher, Teasley and
Wider consider teachers are listeners, facilitators, and consensus builders who
assist students in becoming film connoisseurs. Via curriculum design and
viewer-response approach, teachers can guide students with many possibilities. After
reading this chapter, some thoughts linger on my minds.
As shown in the chapter, Teasley and Wider made
a twist on reader-response approach and turned it into viewer-response approach
which would be fit for film study. I actually like this idea, for “viewer”
would be a broader term than “reader.” That is, a viewer not only reads but
also listens, which makes viewing a film an integrated experience of texts,
images, and sounds. However, it is a pity, I think, that the example in chapter
as to how a teacher guided students to respond to film does not seem to show
the discussion about music or sound effects in the film. I understand that
Teasley and Wider intended to employ film as an instructional tool to teach
English and literacy, yet as music and sound effects have a huge impact on
viewers’ feelings toward a scene, a character, or even the whole movie, it
would be better to have some conversations about how music and sound effects
contribute to the viewers’ interpretation and understanding of a movie. (Let’s
just think about how many times we remember a movie because of the song in it,
and how many times when we hear a unique sound effect in Star Wars, we know Darth
Vader is coming.)
![]() |
| World's Greatest Dad (Source:http://thewisecracker.com/2011/11/funny-star-wars-cartoon-darth-vader-worlds-greatest-dad/) |
Another thought I have is about the writing
activities. Teasley and Wider mentioned some writing activities, such as
personal essays, analytical essays, imaginative writing, writing film
treatments, scripts, and storyboard, and film reviews (from chapter 2). All of
which are useful for teachers to use as a mean to nurture students’ literacy skills
and creativity. I am thinking that having students to write about film may have
already been an exciting activity for students. To make it more motivating,
teachers may also encourage students to write a review for a latest movie and
submit it to local newspapers or school newsletters. If students’ reviews get
published, it may also motivate students to keep writing, which might be
another way to foster students becoming lifelong viewers.
Overall, I think Teasley and Wider’s text
is a good resource for English teachers who hope to incorporate film in
teaching literacy. Though what they suggest is feasible and practical, teachers
still have to tailor lessons according to students’ needs and class schedule.

Ying, I love your idea for submitting the review to a newspaper. People working at newspapers love to help students who are interested in their field and will often encourage more submissions or be willing to serve as mentors.
ReplyDeleteYing--That's a great question, thinking about using films in other content areas. I think that using films in history is a great teaching tool. You can use short clips or scenes from movies to help students build background knowledge about a far-away culture or unfamiliar time. They could also be taught to critically view these films and compare the representations of film with what they found to be true through historical study.
ReplyDelete