Bomer’s chapters
continue to introduce his thoughts about literature being not only for teaching
and learning reading and writing but also a way to live our lives. Bomer took
readers on a tour to different English classrooms to see how teachers guided
students to respond to literature. Also, Bomer explained how strategies
introduced in the preceding chapters could be used along with experiencing
literature. As I read through chapters, I noticed that what Bomer carefully and
purposefully presented is to show teachers’ teaching philosophy matters and how
knowledge and emotion are connected.
Usually
teachers’ teaching philosophy affects how they arrange the class, select
reading materials, and assign coursework. In chapter 5, we see teachers
arranged their class differently every day with different reasons. The reason
to do so could be summarized by Bomer, who stated that “The point is not to inject
them with, for example, paired reading so that they have ‘had that,’ but to
provide an experience that will add to their repertoire of situations into
which they can put themselves, and perhaps to situate them in a conversation
that will change their mental habits – get them to actively construct sense,
test a text against their own life, or formulate questions as they read, for example
– when they read on their own” (p. 99). In other words, the teachers, including
Bomer, tried to construct a reading life for students, helping students to
build a relationship with literature before they jump into interpreting and
analyzing literature as they read. The purpose, according to Bomer, is “opening
opportunities for what Frank Smith calls ‘membership in the club,” helping them
[students] to see themselves as ‘the type of person’ who would meaningfully engage
in and with reading and writing” (p. 105). This sort of teaching philosophy –
encouraging students exploring literature via their senses, their curiosity,
and even their impulse – is close to the quintessence of reader-response theory
and highly related to John Dewey’s educational philosophy.
John
Dewey recognized that emotion plays an important role in thinking and learning,
stating that “Knowledge is a small cup of water floating on a sea of emotion” (Fishman
and McCarthy, 1998, p.21). That is, emotion is a source of knowledge. Our feelings
toward a person, an event, or an incident influence the choices we make, which
affects the way we reason and construct knowledge. TV commercials are examples
of arousing customers’ emotion by blending sound and image to influence our
choices. What happened in the courtroom at the end of the book, Monster, is another example that defendant
lawyers and the prosecutor used language to appeal to jury and, to some extent,
elicit their empathy for James King and Steve Harmon.
Overall,
Bomer’s texts enable me to see how teaching philosophy can be actualized and
put into practice via the use of teaching strategies and the purposeful-arranged
classes. I always think this is a very difficult task for teachers, but Bomer
seemed to make it possible!
Reference:
Bomer, R. (1995). Time for meaning: Crafting literature lives in middle and high school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Fisherman, S. M. & McCarthy, L. (1998). John Dewey and the challenge of classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
![]() |
| (Source: http://bemusingjobingo.blogspot.com/2010/02/tok-again-knowledge-and-emotion.html) |
Question:
In Figure 7.1 (on p.121), Bomer showed examples of possible schedules for introducing different genres to students. Do you think they are feasible? Why?

I, too, liked Bomer's showing us different classrooms and how different teachers got students engaged in reading and writing. As for the teaching tables, they seem feasible, but I wonder whether we can't incorporate different genres over the course of the year as opposed to teaching different genres at different times. Would, for example, teaching memoir work if students weren't focused on it throughout the memoir unit?
ReplyDeleteYing,
ReplyDeleteIn response to your question, I was wondering the same thing! I always find it helpful when a t ext I can relate to gives an application piece, but I was wondering if this list works based on the previous classroom conversation we had last week.
I also appreciated how Bomer gave so much practical advice. It was refreshing after hearing so much of the theory behind his teaching. I think the lists that he presents could work--but would probably need to be reshaped according to the class that one was teaching. As Bomer continually points out, our teaching should be a response to student interest and work, not a set of texts to plod through. When planning any curriculum, perhaps we should not plan so far in advance, even, if we really want to be responsive to students.
ReplyDelete